Monday, August 30, 2010

Kyle Leaman finally finishes his HUGE list of Jackie Chan's 100 best fight scenes...

When 'the Part-Time Critic' gets into a project, he doesn't do it half-assed. He's been slowly compiling a list of his picks for the 100 best fight scenes featuring Mr. Jackie Chan. He started at the end of June, and he finally posted the final top-ten list this afternoon, thus allowing me to link to it. 100 fight scenes, each with a solid paragraph of context and a You Tube embed of pretty much every single one. Allison didn't have preschool today and I'll likely be at work all day tomorrow, thus that alleged '2010 summer box office analysis' might be a bit delayed. I'm seeing Machete on Wednesday night, but the review won't drop until 12:01am on Friday (embargo). So until I get a chance to bang out something more relevant than a random trailer or a bit on a rumor that gets debunked a week later, here's Kyle Leaman's rundown of Jackie Chan's Top 100 Action Scenes. Enjoy...

Scott Mendelson

Sunday, August 29, 2010

Bill O'Reilly's straw-man argument: Of course The Expendables is (slightly) patriotic, but it's not 'NATIONALISTIC'. Altough he has one good point...


It's a common tactic brandished on the Right, and occasionally used by the Left, to create a straw-man argument and then bring on someone to validate or combat said viewpoint. Bill O'Reilly himself has been famous for his annual 'War on Christmas' series that seems to crop up every December. I know of no one who has discussed The Expendables in anything but the broadest social terms (it has no real agenda other than to entertain and make money), and certainly not a single critic has vilified Stallone for the film's content aside from its worth as an action drama. The film is subtly patriotic, but it's not NATIONALISTIC, which is what O'Reilly is defending it against. For what it's worth, the film's villain is an American imperialist tycoon, and the bad guys use water-boarding to torture a damsel in distress, and righteous Americans do battle to put a stop to it. In other words, heroic Americans do battle with evil Americans and save an indigenous populace for outside invaders because they basically want to do a 'mitzvah' for once in their greedy, soulless lives (yes, it's the same broad idea as The Wild Bunch).

Sure, Stallone is obviously a moderate Conservative, but that doesn't mean every movie he makes is an action-movie equivalent to An American Carol. Hell, I've long argued that the horrifying violent and relentless hopeless Rambo was an apology for how his prior Rambo films were interpreted as pro-war, gung-ho adventures in imperialism. As far as O'Reily preemptively defending the movie from smears it has not really received, it's the same thing as a NBC announcing that the newest episode of Law and Order: Special Victims Unit is 'controversial' before it even airs. It gets people to pay attention who otherwise wouldn't care and/or lets them feel righteous over their endorsement of an entertainment that they would have seen and enjoyed anyway.

O'Reilly is dead-on at one point of the interview, stating that 'these pinheads, in order to justify their column, have to go in and blow this stuff up'. Steven Zeitchik at the LA Times needed an excuse to write about The Expendables, so he basically asked a 'when did you stop beating your wife?' type question regarding the film's alleged nationalism, something which is not the least bit apparent to anyone actually watching the film (he quotes the misleading trailer, rather the film itself for evidence, which implies that he didn't see the film). And like so many on both sides of the isle, he confuses patriotism with nationalism, thus making it seem like he's bashing the act of being patriotic.

It's something I've complained about quite a bit in the last few years, as entertainment journalists or general pundits find a six degrees of Kevin Bacon-type connection between a hit movie and a social issue and attempt to tie the two together for the sake of provocation. So Jigsaw becomes Osama Bin Laden, Tony Stark becomes a conservative apologist, America's Heart and Soul becomes the conservative counterpoint to Fahrenheit 9/11, and the filmography of Sly Stallone becomes a focal point for jingoistic nationalism (you can make a case for Cobra being right-wing propaganda, but it's still a fun piece of action/horror trash).

Of course, in calling out this straw-man fallacy O'Reilly creates his own straw man argument by making the cardinal mistake that so many others do, taking the opinion of one random writer and spinning it as a barometer of critical opinion. Just like a single critically praised but otherwise ignored film (Brick) and a single praised but under-watched TV series (Veronica Mars) did not constitute a trend of 'high school film noir', one LA Times writer accusing The Expendables of being 'patriotic' (by which he means nationalistic) does not a trend make.

Scott Mendelson

Last Exorcism, Takers overperform and Avatar returns as summer 2010 ends on a solid note. Weekend box office (08/29/10).

Despite my offhand comments last week about summer being over, two new openers delivered better-than-expected results as summer officially came to a close. It was a tight race for first place this weekend, as Lionsgate's The Last Exorcism took the runner-up spot with $20.3 million. The fake exorcism documentary was a bit frontloaded (2.1x weekend multiplier) and received a 'D' from CinemaScore. However, that audience distaste was more a result of fraudulent marketing, as the socially relevant, relatively realistic and gore-less fauxomentary was sold as a thrill-a-minute horror film from the mind of Eli Roth and a religious thriller in the vein of The Exorcism of Emily Rose. In other words, audiences hated it for the same reasons that critics generally enjoyed it (it's at 71% on Rotten Tomatoes), it's just that critics hadn't felt that they had been sold a bill of goods.

Ironically, while he was only a producer on this one, it opened bigger than any of the three films (Cabin Fever, Hostel, and Hostel II) that Eli Roth himself directed. The film posted the 15th-biggest opening in Lionsgate history, their seventeenth $20 million+ debut, and their fifth-biggest opening not involving a Saw sequel or a Tyler Perry epic. Regardless of longterm business, Lionsgate allegedly picked this up for $1 million, so this is their second major win in a month after The Expendables (at $82 million, the Sly Stallone epic is now their fourth-highest grossing film). I'm glad to see that Lionsgate is getting their mojo back, partially by returning to their roots a bit. Their 2-year quest for 'respectability' has not been kind to them. At the end of the day, Lionsgate theatrical puts out trashy action pictures, high-end horror fare, and the Tyler Perry melodramas. It's what they are known for and what they are good at marketing. Let their DVD branch put out the prestige stuff (Winter's Bone, Away From Her, Agora, This September Issue, Stoning of Soraya M., etc) via Village Roadshow and New Market.

Somewhat surprisingly, first place went to the Screen Gems cheapie Takers. Despite a delayed release date and some of the worst photo-shopping I've ever seen on a poster, the riff on Michael Mann's Heat opened to $20.5 million. Produced for around $20 million, the film has a B-star cast (Idris Elba, Hayden Christensen, Matt Dillon, Chris Brown, Jay Hernandez, Zoe Zaldana, and Paul Walker), and a solid trailer. Pardon the broken record, but there is a distinct lack of B-movie genre fare like this, and if you can keep the costs in line, you can usually make money on an old-fashioned action picture. It looked more big-scale than Armored and less comic book-flashy than The Losers (which theoretically turned off older audiences), thus you get a good opening off of Takers where as audiences generally ignored Armored and The Losers. For a shock, check out the cast lists for those three caper pictures, as Idris Elba, Zoe Zaldana, Matt Dillon, and Columbus Short were all in two of those three respective heist pictures.

In limited release news, Neil Marshall's Centurion scored $42,826 on 12 screens. Many have wondered why Marhall's followup to The Descent and Doomsday didn't merit a larger release, this is a Magnolia release. They basically do tiny theatrical releases as gloried advertisements for the Video On Demand and eventual DVD/Blu Ray releases. Only one to three movies per year even make it on 100 screens, and most are FAR fewer. Of course, that still doesn't excuse them opening The Host on the same weekend as 300 back in early 2007. Although, for a mediocre Mangolia film that's loads of fun anyway, check out The Oxford Murders if it's still on VoD (just listening to John Hurt pontificate for 105 minutes makes the movie). In other 'limited release' news, some art house picture called Avatar got a specialty release this weekend on 800 IMAX and 3D screens. The environmental sci-fi film, apparently from that guy who made Aliens and Titanic, grossed $4 million for a $4,9306 per-screen average, the third best in the top-twenty. Oh wait... right. The re-release of James Cameron's Avatar spurred about 400,000 people to leave their homes to see a movie that has been on DVD and Blu Ray for several months. Anyway, the film crossed the $750 million mark, ending the weekend with $753 million in domestic sales. It will be in re-release until Resident Evil: Afterlife takes said 3D and IMAX screens away on September 10th.

In holdover news, Toy Story 3 crossed the $1 billion worldwide box office mark, making Disney the first studio to have two $1 billion-grossers in one year (after Alice in Wonderland, which Toy Story 3 will surpass next week), and owner of three of the seven films that have grossed $1 billion in global ticket sales. It's already the sixth-biggest film of all-time, with $54 million between it and Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest for fourth place. Last weekend's new movies (Vampires Suck, Lottery Ticket, The Switch, Nanny McPhee Returns, and Piranha 3D) had large but not fatal tumbles. Eat Pray Love is at $60 million, Inception is at $270 million, and The Other Guys is just shy of $100 million.

That's all for this weekend. Join us next weekend when Drew Barrymore and Justin Long try Going the Distance, while George Clooney tries his luck with a Wednesday opening with The Assassin (don't do it George... you're not Harry Potter!), and Danny Trejo teams up with Jessica Alba, Cheech Marin, Michelle Rodriguez, and Lindsey Lohan against Steven Seagal, Jeff Fahey, and Robert DeNiro in Robert Rodriguez's Machete (which I'll be seeing on Wednesday, so look for a review on Friday morning).

Scott Mendelson

Saturday, August 28, 2010

2010 Summer Movie Review part I: The Moments That Mattered.

We'll see if my schedule allows me to do a compressive 'end of summer' box office wrap-up, but since summer 2010 doesn't officially end until September 3rd, I figure I've got time. But for now, here is a rundown of the various scenes, performances, moments, and miscues that defined the summer just past. Because sometimes, discussing the 'parts' is more fun than discussing the 'whole'. I'll try to avoid divulging plot twists and the like, but consider this a SPOILER WARNING.

Funniest moment of the summer: the demonstration goes horribly wrong in Splice.
No fair spoiling it here, but there's a moment about halfway through the otherwise taut and terrific sci-fi horror picture where Adrien Brody and Sarah Polley are giving a corporate presentation regarding their recent scientific endeavors. Let's just say it's easily the most outrageously funny scene of this nature since ED-209 told that unlucky executive to put down the gun in Robocop.

Best moment in a bad film: The action climax of The Last Airbender
There are no more heartbreaking disappointment this summer than watching M. Night Shyamalan, the man who made two of the best films of the last fifteen years (The Sixth Sense and Unbreakable), completely and utterly fall apart in every way. But even in this horribly-acted, poorly paced, and terribly-written tragedy, there were those moments when you realize what M. Night Shyamalan might have been able to deliver if he was willing to play director-for-hire on any other action picture. Long, fluid takes of hundreds of warriors throwing supernatural weapons and magic at each other, with every bit of it crystal clear and every beat easy to understand: this is the stuff of real movie magic. As bad as the film is, the action finale of The Last Airbender is a bravura action sequence that only makes the movie's failure that much more unfortunate. Ironically for a man who was once destined to be the next Spielberg/Lucas, I today speak of Shyamalan in the vein of Luke Skywalker and Padmé Amidala trying to convince people that Anakin Skywalker still has 'some good in him'.

Most astonishingly inept technical choice: Salt's theme song sing-along.
I've written about this elsewhere, but there was no more head-slappingly boneheaded decision this year by a filmmaker then whomever chose to have a orchestral theme song for the Angelina Jolie spy thriller that literally has singers chanting 'Salt! Salt! Salt!' when Jolie goes into action mode. When crafting a dark and violent spy thriller, it's best not to have your audience giggling to themselves during major action sequences and/or dramatic moments.

Come for the short cartoon, then leave: Road Runner, Wile E. Coyote return.
Cats and Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore was so bad that my two-year old daughter was noticeably bored (it makes G-Force look like Babe). But the three-minute 'Coyote Falls' animated short that proceeded it was almost worth the price of admission. Although it was only half the length of a normal Merry Melody, the computer-animated short was every bit as clever, smart, and laugh-out loud funny as the classics from the 1940s and 1950s. It was a perfect moment, sitting with my daughter on my lap and laughing at a Road Runner/Wile E. Coyote cartoon; until she turned to me and stated in a matter-of-fact fashion "I don't like this." I'm pretty sure she said that purely to hurt me.

Most surprising social relevance in a bad movie: Jonah Hex vs. right-wing terrorists.
Sure, Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time was a giant Iraq war parable, which would have been a lot ballsier had the film been made in 2003, but the big flop of the summer took on a surprising potency due to its timely storyline. In short, the film concerns a psychotic former-Confederate soldier who plots to massacre to US government to avenge the South's defeat and/or inspire the populace to turn against the government that failed to protect them from slaughter. Whether it was an intentional commentary on Tim McVeigh and/or the worst fears of a (theoretically) militant Tea Party, watching John Malkovich's Colonel Turnbell preach about restoring American values while dispatching suicide bombers and weapons of mass destruction against American civilians was not a little bit chilling.

"I've got a bad feeling about this": Whiplash attacks race track in Iron Man 2
For the first thirty-five minutes or so, the Iron Man sequel is a relatively straight-laced affair. Sure it has much of the same sardonic humor that the original film had, but it takes its character and its world seriously. Alas, at the end of the first act, the film shows off its kid-friendly colors. As Tony Stark races around, the murderous Whiplash (Mickey Rourke) unleashes his laser whips and starts attacking the cars on the track. And hilarity ensues? This seemingly chilling bit of  business, with a random terrorist unleashing hell and (theoretically) murdering the occupants of at least a few other cars on the track, is shot and edited like a broadly comic action scene, with the attack intercut with slapstick humor and bits of Pepper Potts and Stark's butler racing around the track trying to get Tony his Iron Man outfit. The scene's obnoxiously goofy tone and the film's refusal to confirm a body count amidst the carnage was a telling sign that the film intended to be more like Batman & Robin than The Dark Knight.

Subtle heartbreak: Ree has her dreams dashed in Winter's Bone.
Jennifer Lawrence will probably get a Best Actress Oscar nomination for her commandingly subtle work in Debra Grannick's terrific rural-poverty thriller (and if there's any justice, John Hawkes will get a Supporting Actor nod too). Like Gabourey Sidibe's turn in Precious last year, it's an interior piece of acting, with no showy moments or big speeches. And the film's best scene is one merely of Lawrence reacting as the ROTC recruiter empathetically but bluntly explains to her that she won't be able to take her younger siblings with her to Basic Training. Since her father is MIA and her mother is basically catatonic, it is immediately apparent that Ree's lone ambition, her only real escape from her dirt-poor existence, is merely a pipe dream. In those brief moments, we see a young girl's last bit of hope utterly squashed.

Best end credits sequence: Explaining the white-collar fraud game in The Other Guys.
The film is basically a serious of improv riffs disguised as a feature, and it basically proves its own point (yes, an action thriller about white collar criminals is dreadfully dull after all), but director Adam McKay gets credit for attempting to educate the audience on the complexities of financial fraud, highlighting those who benefited while the rest of the country suffered. Yes, the explanations are a bit simplistic, but it's a good start for a majority of the audience who have no idea how certain large-scale money theft were or could be carried out. Of course, it also makes you wish the proceeding movie were better.

Worst tonal inconsistency: the opening moments of MacGruber.
MacGruber is an amusing send-up of 80s and 90s action pictures, with its core flaw being that it relies too much on its lead character's inherent funniness for its humor (in that sense, it's closer to the mediocre Austin Powers sequels than the masterpiece original). But the opening moments seem out of another movie entirely, as the lead villain (an underused Val Kilmer) attacks an army convoy and steals a weapon of mass destruction. We only see the aftermath, with fire and debris, dead soldiers covered in blood and dirt, and a lone survivor begging for his life before being executed at point blank range. It's not that the scene isn't funny (it's not supposed to be), but that the film never again takes its violence or its narrative that seriously again, to the film's detriment.

Surefire Awards Clip: Jackie Chan confesses his sin in The Karate Kid.
With all the understandable complaining about reboots and remakes, it does well to remember that one of the better mainstream films of the summer was an 80s remake. Of course, the further irony is that said remake was one of the only real character-driven dramas in multiplexes over the last four months. While the film was derided upon its announcement, it shocked the hell out of everyone by being really good, with solid acting, smart writing, and existing as a terrifically entertaining motion picture in its own right (it was arguably the only summer film that based its marketing campaign around promising a quality movie). But the biggest joy was seeing the legendary Jackie Chan take the iconic role of 'not-Mr. Miyagi' and run with it. Fashioning a darker and more introspective variation on the role that defined Pat Morita, Mr. Han was a rare chance to see Jackie Chan in a straight-up dramatic role in an American film. His initial fight scene is wonderful, as he basically tricks his assailants into beating themselves up. But his 'big scene' comes at the end of the second act, when the morose and tortured Mr. Han finally confesses to young Dre (a winning Jaden Smith) what haunts him so. It's a prototypical 'big moment', but its so raw and uncompromising, and Dre's reaction to it is so potent, that the scene exceeds its potential for cliche. If Sony is willing to spend the money, Jackie Chan may end up with his first Oscar nomination.

Most emotionally-draining moment: the entire last reel of Toy Story 3
I wish I could pick something more unexpected or original, but I'd just be lying and/or being different for the sake of being different. For the second year in a row, Pixar ends the summer with the best film of the year, with no clear challengers on the horizon. As both the end of their legendary Toy Story franchise, and the end of their unofficial 'trilogy of death/rebirth' (Wall-E, Up, and Toy Story 3), Pixar doesn't pull punches or find a way to give audiences the ending that they probably would have preferred. A mother comes to terms with the fact that her son is leaving her for college. A young boy realizes as he gives away his toys that he is truly leaving childhood behind. By witnessing their acceptance of their destinies, a favorite toy realizes that he must let go of the one relationship that has defined him for the sake of his fellow toys, who have truly become his family. It's such a stark moment of closure and finality, ending on the same sky-blue image that started Toy Story 15 years ago, that the filmmakers basically had to add a credit cookie to prevent audiences from driving home in a tear-stained funk. Hell, I'm watering up just typing this.

That's all for this summer. Oh, and in case you're wondering, I honestly couldn't think of a moment in Inception that truly jumped out at me. The film is a wonderful technical exercise/brain teaser, but even the zero-gravity hallway fight scene failed to register on any level other than admiration of how it was created. It's a darn good film, but it's certainly a movie where the whole is superior to the sum of its parts. If you're so inclined, here is last summer's 'Moments That Mattered' article. Hopefully I'll have a financial analysis in the next week, but until then, take care, please comment, and keep reading.

Scott Mendelson

Dumb idea of the week: Pairing Tom Cruise with an unknown to boost box office? Fourth Mission: Impossible film to not be titled 'Mission: Impossible'?

Long story short, Paramount is doing all kinds of tinkering with the fourth Mission: Impossible picture, in a bid to cut down costs (yes, Randy, I know...), and/or 'reboot the series'. As Variety reported the other day, the two big change is that co-star Jeremy Renner will now be a co-lead with Tom Cruise, in a theoretical passing of the torch should Paramount or Tom Cruise decide to continue the series without Tom Cruise. Also of note is that the studio is considering calling the film something other than 'Mission: Impossible'. Brad Bird is (thankfully) still directing and the film is still set for December 2011.

As for the whole 'co-lead' business, it's a reasonable idea on the surface but if you look at why it's being done it's a little moronic. Yes, Tom Cruise isn't quite the mega-star that he used to be. Yes, Knight and Day 'only' grossed $215 million worldwide so far on a $110 million budget. But Jeremy Renner, Oscar nomination, obvious talent, and what-not aside, is a complete and total unknown to 90% of the movie-going populace. Most of America did not see The Hurt Locker. At best, anyone who knows Renner knows him from said Bigelow Oscar winner or as 'that guy from SWAT'. Sure, he may become a big star when Ben Affleck's The Town comes out in three weeks. And yes, he's playing Hawkeye in The Avengers. But The Avengers does not come out until five months after M:I4. And, while it's admirable that Paramount seems trying to 'make a star', it's a little insulting and cynical that the studio thinks that Tom Cruise needs box office help from someone that most filmgoers haven't even heard of. Furthermore, this is a trap for Renner himself. If the picture doesn't open huge, except an avalanche of articles asking 'is Jeremy Renner really a star?'.

As for the title thing, I'm not sure what the hell they are thinking frankly. The series, with its director-musical chairs and flexible continuity, has exactly two major selling points: Tom Cruise in an action thriller, and the four-decade long brand name. If you're downplaying the presence of Tom Cruise (still a stupid thing to do, despite his best attempts at public relations suicide), and you're removing the Mission: Impossible name (and music?), what exactly will be the hook for this $100+ tentpole picture? Does Paramount really think that anyone other than film nerds are going to be excited at the mere concept of a big-budget action picture from 'that guy who directed The Incredibles' and starring 'that guy from that Hurt Locker-thingy'? Free advice to Paramount: you've got one of the most beloved brand names in television history, and you've got one of the biggest stars on the planet. I suggest you use both of those items to your full advantage.

Scott Mendelson

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

The Empire Strikes Back as a silent movie.


This is clever and amusing, and the piano version of the Emperor's March at 0:55 is a nice tough. Even in somewhat goofy silent movie-style, that shot of Vader and Luke battling it out on that thin extension over the chasm (mostly cropped out here but visible at 0:22) is still the definitive moment of the whole six films for me.

Scott Mendelson

Hatchet II to open nationally in wide-release in its unrated glory.

Dark Sky just sent out a press release, basically stating that the horror sequel Hatchet II will actually be released nationwide through AMC in its unrated 'director's cut'. I never saw the original Hatchet, ironically because Blockbuster never carried the unrated DVD for rent and I just forgot about it over the years. Since the unrated Blu Ray will be released on September 9th, I'm going to try to rectify that soon enough. Anyway, this is actually pretty big news. Although it will probably be a limited-time release, we have a horror picture being given a wide, national release (in twenty markets) through a major theater chain without having been rated by the MPAA. I'm not one who thinks that the MPAA is the root of all evil, especially considering how prevalent these unrated or director's cuts have become on the DVD market (IE - everyone gets to see the intended vision within a few months anyway). But the issue has never been the MPAA, but rather the national theater chains refusing to screen unrated pictures and the hesitancy of newspapers and television stations to allow advertising for unrated (or NC-17-rated) pictures. If the theatrical release of Hatchet II is in any way a success, it could very well open the floodgates for this kind of niche national release, especially regarding documentaries and independent cinema. This is good news all around. The press release and trailer is below.

Scott Mendelson




ADAM GREEN'S "HATCHET II" SLASHES ITS WAY INTO THEATRES KICKING OFF THE 2010 HALLOWEEN HORROR MOVIE SEASON

AMC Theatres ® To Release The Film Nationwide Oct 1 -- The Widest Release of An Unrated Genre Film In More Than 25 Years

"HATCHET II" Cast Features Cavalcade Of Horror Movie Icons Including Danielle Harris (HALLOWEEN), Tony Todd (CANDYMAN), R.A. Mihailoff (TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE) and Kane Hodder (FRIDAY THE 13th) reprising his role as serial killer Victor Crowley


Orland Park (IL) (August 24, 2010) - Dark Sky Films, a division ofMPI Media Group, announced today that in anticipation of the upcoming Halloween horror movie season, Adam Green's HATCHET II will be distributed in theaters across the country beginning Oct 1. The film will be released without an MPAA rating, marking the widest release of an unrated genre film in more than 25 years.

AMC Theatres, under its AMC independent program, will be exhibiting HATCHET II in the top 20 markets across the country. Vitagraph Films is serving as theatrical distributor. The announcement regarding the HATCHET II release was made jointly by Adam Green with MPI Media Group's Senior Vice President of Acquisitions Greg Newman.

A ferociously fun tribute to the old-school horror sensation slasher movies of the 80's, HATCHET II is the follow-up to the popular original film, which was released theatrically in 2007 and became a sleeper-hit, gaining a wide following on DVD. The cast of HATCHET II features a cavalcade of horror movie icons including Danielle Harris (HALLOWEEN) and Kane Hodder (FRIDAY THE 13th), reprising his role as serial killer Victor Crowley. Also starring are Tony Todd (CANDYMAN) and R.A. Mihailoff (TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE).

HATCHET II is having its world premiere this week in London at Fright Fest, the UK's premiere horror and fantasy film festival.

Director Adam Green said, "Having a movie as graphically over the top as HATCHET II come out in major theatres unrated is an absolute dream come true -- not only for the genre fans but for the entire make-up effects crew who normally have to watch their amazing achievements get sliced and diced for theatrical release. This is an important event for the horror genre and I hope the real horror fans support HATCHET II and help change the way genre films are released theatrically from this day forward. Kudos to Dark Sky Films and AMC theaters for truly honoring the spirit of old school American horror and doing this right. Gorehounds won't know what hit them!"

Dark Sky Films' Newman added, "We are thrilled that audiences will not have to wait for a director's cut or unrated version of Adam Green's HATCHET II. On October 1st fans will have the opportunity to see Hatchet II in theaters exactly as it was intended to be seen: full-on, uncut and uncensored! We hope that this unrated release of HATCHET II marks a new trend in providing an uncompromised theatrical experience for genre film lovers nationwide."

"Our AMC independent program embraces diverse storytelling of all types," said AMC Theatres' Vice President, Specialty & Alternative Content, Nikkole Dneson-Randolph. "Bringing a story like HATCHET II to our guests is a natural fit during this time of year and we're excited to share the filmmakers' vision on-screen in its intended state."

"Ice to meet you!" 68 seconds that killed a franchise.


Another entry in the 'someone has too much time on his hands' category. To think, Batman & Robin could have been a somewhat OK film with just 70 seconds trimmed out. Also, I posted this because my wife actually likes the sheer stupidity of Arnold's non-stop punning. Yes, that's right, I married a woman who prefers Batman & Robin to The Dark Knight. She also loves Grease 2.

DVD Review: Harry Brown (2010)

Harry Brown
2010
103 minutes
rated R
Available August 31st from Sony Home Entertainment on DVD and Blu Ray

by Scott Mendelson

The film's theatrical review can be found here.

The DVD:
The film is shot on high-definition video and presented in 2.35:1. This is a dark and gray picture, and it probably looks better on DVD and Blu Ray than it did in most theaters (since so many auditoriums project films at low light levels). This is certainly not a show-off transfer, but the film looks relatively fine. As for the audio, the English 5.1 plays as a 2.0 mix on my non-existent audio set-up. I will say that the audio for the feature was lower than I'm used to, in that I had to turn up the 'volume' on my HDTV several notches higher than normal. The film comes with several subtitle selections, and I didn't notice any glaring issues with the English subtitle stream. The DVD and Blu Ray share the same bonus material. There is an insightful and detailed commentary with Michael Caine, director Daniel Barber, and producer Kris Thykier. There are also 17 minutes worth of deleted scenes, all of which are worth watching, but none of which desperately needed to be in the film. The first one, which fleshes out the disconnect between the police and the victims, is good but makes Mortimer's partner unconsciously unsympathetic right off the bat. Also included are several previews for other Sony releases.

Film: B+
Video: A-
Audio: B-
Extras: B-

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Guest Review: Piranha 3D (2010)

Here is another guest review from friend and colleague R.L. Shaffer of DVD Future. This is not a case of him seeing a press screening that I had to miss, merely a case of him writing a review pretty much identical to the one I was going to write just this morning. So enjoy R.L. Shaffer's take on Piranha 3D. Fortunately, there will be only one piranha monster movie on my ten-best list this year, and it will be Mega Piranha.

Piranha 3D
2010
89 minutes
rated R

by R.L. Shaffer

There's about 15, maybe 20 minutes of Piranha 3D that's salvageable. The rest of the film is total junk, and not in an inventive, enjoyable, campy sort of way. Rather, this is garbage -- a direct-to-video mess that just happened to have a somewhat decent budget, and enough top class performers to garner a theatrical release -- in crummy up-converted 3D no less.

Now, obviously, I know that Piranha 3D was meant to be a bit tongue-and-cheek, as was the uneven, but entertaining original. That's clear right from the start, when Richard Dreyfuss, sporting his Matt Hooper costume from Jaws, is killed by our angry piranhas. But that's sort of the problem of the picture -- it was such an easy gag, and not a particularly funny one, either. I love Jaws. I take no joy in watching my favorite character from that film buy it at the hands of angry, poorly computer-generated fish in a sequence that barely makes a lick of sense. And I certainly don't like the idea of watching Richard Dreyfuss reprising the role just for a laugh. It's mean-spirited, crass and pointless.

Piranha 3D doesn't seem to know when to be funny, when to be scary or when to ignite its audience. It's a blind man playing darts. Sort of like Date Movie and those other uninspired spoofs. It takes ideas and tosses them into a meat grinder and hopes it can make its audience smile. But the gags themselves don't always make sense, and most aren't even remotely funny. The film just lumbers around looking for a gag, often getting sidetracked from the story at hand.

It's a shame director Alexandre Aja, who crafted the extraordinary effective remake of The Hills Have Eyes, was able to nab so many cameos and former A-list stars and character actors for the picture. I feel ashamed for these performers. A key example is the Christopher Lloyd cameo. Why the hell is this loveable actor here? Is this all he can get these days?

Same goes for Elisabeth Shue, who plays the town's local sheriff, Julie. She's tasked with taking care of her kids all while protecting a gaggle of drunken college students -- ready for a spring break full of orgies and date rape -- from blood-thirsty prehistoric piranhas. She's a paper-thin archetype, at best. And she's given nothing to make her interesting. Shue, an Academy Award-nominated actress, gives it her best, but ultimately it's all for naught. She's basically forced to slum it in a film she should have no business being in.

Even worse are the characters themselves. Virtually no one is likable. Our hero, Julie's son (Steven R. McQueen), is completely blank. The girl he's after (Jessica Szohr) seems more interested in material things, but she's never held accountable for her behavior. At the beginning of the film she breaks up with her boyfriend because he couldn't get her backstage passes -- not because he poured a blue slushi on the shirt of our hero (her friend) just for a laugh. How am I supposed to find anything likable about this girl? How am I supposed to feel fear when she's thrown into peril? It's clear director Alexandre Aja wants me to feel fear, but I don't -- not one bit. Jerry O'Connell plays as jerkish Girls Gone Wild type in the film, but he's so brash, over-the-top and mean-spirited, it's hard to watch him, and it's not even rewarding when he gets his "comeuppance." And, what's worse, we're meant to hate him for how he objectifies women, but the whole film is one giant ode to exploitation. Aren't we objectifying as well? By this logic, shouldn't we be eaten, too?

The only interesting character is Adam Scott's seismologist, Novak. He too is painfully cliche, but Scott nails the science geek-turned-action hero riff. He's immediately likable, funny and heroic. And he gets to take part in several of the film's best gags. Why the picture spends less than 15 minutes with this character is really quite frustrating. But the real damage of Piranha 3D, besides the unlikable characters, lazy story, and uneven tone that balances humor, exploitation and horror like a toddler wielding a plastic baseball bat in one hand and a broad sword in the other, is the film's gore and shockingly uneventful 3D.

It's no surprise (if you read my reviews at DVD Future or over at IGN) that I love exploitation pictures. I like excessive gore in movies. And I love excessive nudity. I love more films in Roger Corman's catalog than I'd like to admit (including the original film, the sequel and the first remake, made back in 1995 -- though admittedly the Piranha series is far from my favorite of his films). But Aja's Piranha takes it several steps too far. At times, the gore is funny. At times, it's brutally effective. But most of the time it's simply too much. The effects look surprisingly real, and once the mayhem gets into full swing, there's no stopping the parade of extreme gore -- the tone of the picture forever shifted.

Make no mistake, Piranha 3D is easily the single goriest, bloodiest film ever to receive the R-rating. It's brutally gory, and not in a fun Evil Dead/Dead Alive/Dawn of the Dead sort of way. This is stomach-churning, traumatic gore. There's eviscerated bodies, flesh chewed down to the bone, women split in half, faces torn off, detached limbs, detached halves, breasts and penises ripped apart, decapitations, explosions, eyeballs being torn out and so much more. It's all well done, but frankly, it's too much. The effects guys deserve credit for making most of it look surprisingly real, but at a serious cost. Some gore is meant to be off-screen.

And there isn't a catharsis here, even though it's clear that's what Aja was going for. Sure, we hate these horny college frat boys and sluts, but it's no fun watching them die, particularly because they get taken out in such gruesome, cruel ways. The film feels both misogynistic -- focusing on nasty female deaths more than male deaths -- and painfully immature, relishing in the violent deaths of the teens who probably picked on the writers and director when they were kids. Neither proves fun to watch, particularly one sequence in which a young girl's hair is caught in a propeller. Her face is torn from her body as the propeller breaks free.

Here's a bootleg version of the scene that leaked online a few months back:

This scene is meant to be funny, but it's not. It's horrific, brutally so, simply because her cries before her death were all too real -- drawing audiences out of the absurdity of the scene.

A real exploitation picture tends to have a few highlighted sequences of extreme gore, not 45 minutes of pure nihilistic bloodiness. Too much is either numbing, or just that -- too much. A half dozen sequences are a delight -- something you can share with your friends who haven't seen the film. But Piranha 3D is saturated with those types of scenes -- too many to even remember.

The 3D effects don't help matters much, either. Already, the film is too disorientating and clustered, but the 3D only serves to detract from the proceedings. The effects rarely work. The image looks hazy and clogged. And the RealD CG effects don't look photo-realistic in the slightest, especially compared to the 35MM photography. Ultimately, the gimmick of 3D is amusing and inspired (an ode to gimmicky 3D features like "Friday the 13th 3D), but the execution, like the rest of the film, is dull and wasted. At the end of the day, the single best 3D gag in the film is an amusingly poetic underwater ballet performed by two completely nude models (Kelly Brook and Riley Steele). It's funny, exploitative, tantalizing and oddly exhilarating.

I know some film goers are going to watch Piranha 3D and find a mecca of camp, gore, sex and nasty nihilism. The film is jam-packed with the stuff. But it isn't a good exploitation picture. It's a bottom feeder -- more obsessed with shocking than entertaining. A good exploitation picture is certainly shocking, but it has an interesting story and surprisingly fleshed-out characters in-between the gore, nudity and horror. Piranha 3D might think it's a funny ode to these types of B-grade exploitation pictures, but it's more aligned with C-grade DTV trash. It's unfunny, mean and brutally nihilistic to a fault.

Grade: D

Sunday, August 22, 2010

Expendables tops Vampires Suck, Piranha, Switch, Nanny McPhee 2, Lottery Ticket. Eclipses tops New Moon, Pilgrim dies. Weekend box office (8/22/10)

It was a rare 'everybody loses' weekend at the box office, with the only silver lining existing in low budgets and/or strong foreign business. Five new wide releases were dumped on the movie-going populace, and not a single one grossed more than $12 million over the weekend. In number one was not a new film, but last weekend's champion. Sylvester Stallone enjoyed his second weekend at number one with The Expendables, which dropped a reasonable 51% in weekend two. Comparatively, Freddy vs. Jason dropped 63% in its second weekend while Alien vs. Predator dropped 67%. The picture grossed $16.9 million and ended its tenth day with $65.3 million. This makes the film a solid bet to surpass the $90 million gross of Madea Goes to Jail and become Lionsgate's second-highest grossing film in its history (first is Fahrenheit 9/11, with $123 million). That the film didn't collapse after its first weekend is again a testament to the strong appeal of old-fashioned meat and potatoes entertainment aimed at audiences who don't necessarily race out to see a movie on opening weekend. We film nerds discussed the film as a sort of 'Action All Stars to the Rescue', but general audiences simply took the film as a big-budget action picture starring Stallone and a handful of other notable action stars. They didn't care about discussing the film's politics or what its success represented for society at large. The film has major issues, but at the end of the day, it delivers what it promises, which has been an all-too rare thing this summer.

Coming in second was the top new opener, yet another Freidberg/Seltzer 'spoof' Vampires Suck. Opening on Wednesday, the film crossed $12.2 million over the three-day weekend and $18.5 million over its five-day weekend. Its loss at the hands of The Expendables has to be a little cathartic, as Stallone's Rambo opened in second place in early 2008 to Meet the Spartans, with charges that kids were buying tickets to the PG-13 300 'spoof' and sneaking into the R-rated gorefest. This is a slightly comeback for Freidberg and Seltzer, as their previous film Disaster Movie, opened with just $5.8 million. Two things: Disaster Movie was the only one of these laugh-less wonders not distributed by Fox (it was handled by Lionsgate), and it stands to reason that quite a few Twilight fans showed up to watch their favorite franchise get mocked. These 'Hey, now we're replicating a scene from another movie!' or 'Hey, it's a random pop culture figure!' non-satires (Date Movie, Epic Movie, Meet the Spartans, Disaster Movie, and now Vampires Suck) may represent the nadir of lazy filmmaking, but as long as the budgets remain in the $20 million range, we'll be seeing more of them. At least Ken Jeong got a paycheck. Oh, for the record, these fiends had nothing to do with Superhero Movie, and it was actually a reasonably funny satire of comic book films.

Eat Pray Love was in third place, dropping 47% in weekend two. With $47.2 million in ten days, the film is about $4 million ahead of the ten-day total of Julie and Julia, but it dropped about 10% more on its respective second weekend (both films made about $12 million on their second weekend). $100 million is still possible, but it's looking less than plausible. Next comes the second opener of the weekend, Lottery Ticket. The 'urban' comedy concerning a winning lottery ticket claimed by a do-gooder in an economically-deprived neighborhood grossed $10.6 million on about 1,973 screens. With $5,399 per screen, it had the highest per-screen average of anything approaching a wide release. At least we've stopped pretending to be shocked when comedies starring African-American casts open to around $10-13 million. With a budget of just $17 million, this is an easy win for Warner Bros. In fifth place was The Other Guys, which dropped 41% in weekend three. At $88.2 million in seventeen days, the film has fallen behind Blades of Glory ($89 million at the end of its third weekend), and should top out around $110 million. If the film hadn't cost $100 million, this would have been a massive win, so next time keep the budget closer to the $60 million spent on Blades of Glory and Step Brothers.

Next up is what may be the most important film to come out of this weekend. Piranha 3D opened with $10.1 million, which isn't too shabby for a $25 million R-rated horror comedy (a sequel has already been more or less green-lit). However, as I noted yesterday, 2D showings of this film were almost impossible to find. This may be a genuine example of a film being hurt by its 3D conversion. The film is just the kind of thing that could be enjoyed by casual moviegoers for a cheap afternoon matinee. However, since 3D tickets run around $15 a pop (in the LA area), there could be no cheap matinee tickets found. Once you take away the 2D viewing options for moviegoers who either don't like 3D or don't want to spend $30 to take their date to an afternoon movie of something like Piranha, you're going to lose quite a few casual moviegoers. Also of note is that the film was held from critics until the very last minute, only to wind up with an 80% score on Rotten Tomatoes (Oscar nominees have scored substantially less). As I've said time (Snakes on a Plane) and time again (Quarantine), do NOT hide your film from the press if it's actually good!!!

Next we have The Switch. Despite starring Jennifer Aniston and Jason Bateman, this Miramax release opened on only 2,000 screens and only managed $8.43 million. The somewhat icky premise likely scared away viewers, and the reviews, while more positive than expected, could not compensate. This was certainly a harder sell than the spouse vs. spouse action comedy theatrics of The Bounty Hunter. Like most actresses not named Julia Roberts, Angelina Jolie, or Jodie Foster, Aniston still needs a notable male co-star to sell a commercial picture. Aaron Eckhart wasn't big enough for Love Happens ($7 million opening), and Jason Bateman is not yet a full-fledged movie star either. Finally, Nanny McPhee Returns opened with $8.4 million. The Emma Thompson vehicle failed to equal the $14.5 million opening weekend of the original back in 2006. Obviously this was not a case of a well-liked original expanding its audience on DVD and television and thus adding interest for the sequel's opening weekend. On the other hand, the $35 million picture has already grossed $71 million worldwide, so Universal was basically treating the domestic release like a desert.

Inception spent what may be its last weekend in the top ten, although it may stick around if all five of these new openers completely collapse. It dropped just 30% and crossed the $260 million mark. Next weekend, it loses its IMAX screens to the rerelease of Avatar. Scott Pilgrim vs. the World plunged 51% in weekend two, just barely crossing $20 million by its second weekend. The film now has no shot of not being a major money loser, although it will live forever on DVD, Blu Ray, and cable television. In limited release debuts, two critically-acclaimed documentaries that drummed up controversy due to their 'R' ratings scored solid debuts. The Tillman Story, a look at the life of the former NFL player who served in Afghanistan, turned against the war effort, and was killed by friendly fire (rated R for language), grossed $13,046 per screen on its four screens. A Film Unfinished, a Holocaust documentary (rated R for nudity) grossed $8,515 per-screen on its four screens.

In holdover news, Twilight Saga: Eclipse surpassed New Moon in domestic grosses, although it will be a struggle to find that last $2.8 million to cross $300 million (cough-second run theaters-cough). Despicable Me crossed $230 million, becoming Universal's seventh-highest grossing film of all time. The Last Airbender crossed $130 million, Dinner For Schmucks crossed $65 million, Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time crossed $90 million, Charlie St. Cloud crossed $30 million, The Sorcerer's Apprentice crossed $60 million, and Toy Story 3 is now the ninth-highest grossing domestic grosser of all-time ($403.8 million), although it likely won't catch up to Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest ($423 million).

Join us next weekend for the official final weekend of summer, although this weekend's results certainly imply that last weekend was the 'season finale'. Anyway, the new releases are the much-delayed heist-pic Takers (starring the new Alex Cross, Idris Elba), The Last Exorcism, and the 700 screen rerelease of James Cameron's Avatar. I can think of no more fitting way to end this mediocre summer than to cap it off with Avatar retaking the box office crown.

Scott Mendelson

Saturday, August 21, 2010

Question of the day: Would Piranha 2D have performed better than Piranha 3D?

Piranha, with $3.5 million on its opening day, is a textbook example of how 3D could end up killing theater-going. Piranha is the very definition of something that could be enjoyed as a cheap afternoon matinée. However, thanks to the 3D surcharge, there is no available cheap matinée, with the cheapest tickets in LA running around $10, those being AMC's before-noon screenings. Anything after noon anywhere runs you at least $13. In all of the LA/Hollywood area, I found two theaters showing Piranha in 2D (the Universal Citywalk 19 and the Pacific Winnetka 21). Once a large majority of big (or small) genre films exist only in 3D, then you lose a large chunk of the casual moviegoers who either don't like 3D or just don't want to pay $30 to take their date to an afternoon showing of something like Piranha. Theaters can charge whatever they want for 3D as long as audiences have a viable 2D option. Take away that, and it becomes that much easier to just spend $20 to buy the DVD/Blu Ray in four months.

Scott Mendelson

Friday, August 20, 2010

Iron Man writers brought in by Paramount and Platinum Dunes to write Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles reboot, coming in 2012.

Amusingly, Nikki Finke reported this news by exclaiming "(Paramount) is looking at (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles) as its next huge franchise, like Transformers, a source told me." That's shocking news, as I thought Nickelodeon paid $60 million for the property last October so they could make a low-budget mumblecore. "Cow... a, um... well, bunga?" Anyway, snark aside, writers Matt Holloway and Art Marcum have been brought on board by Platinum Dunes to revamp the 26-year old comic book franchise. Amusingly enough, these are two of the four writers who were NOT brought along to write Jon Favreau's upcoming Cowboys Vs. Aliens. These two instead followed up their Iron Man script with Punisher: War Zone, which is not a promising sign (did no one notice that, had Frank Castle just stayed in bed, every single bad guy would have arrested on capital charges within 48 hours anyway?). On the other hand, they are currently developing a Justin Lin-directed reboot of Highlander for Summit Entertainment, which is the rare 80s geek property that could actually use a makeover (five movies, a cartoon series, a six-year television series, an ongoing comic book or two, and the TV series was the only thing close to being good).

I'm not sure what Paramount has in mind here. Since the turtles are now owned by Nickelodeon, I'm guessing they don't want to make the new film too dark and/or violent, and the first film was a pretty faithful adaption of the tough and brutal initial comic series anyway. On the other hand, the overgrown kids who worshiped the heroes in a half-shell back in the late 80s/early 90s (shamefully raises hand...) would be aghast if the property were turned into something that could air alongside Dora the Explorer (although the crossover potential with Wonder Pets is not to be discounted). On the plus side, something similar in tone to the animated Avatar: The Last Airbender (very serious storytelling, but plenty of comic relief and a low body count) would work well with the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. Frankly, I'd like just once to see Shredder actually use those spikes he has all over his body to actually shred someone...

We'll know more of what's in mind once a director gets attached and/or they start casting, which should be soon as the studio wants a first draft by October. Two points worth making: 1) The first Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles film is still one of the best comic book superhero films ever made (at least in Germany, they have a decent Blu Ray with the fabled extended ending). 2) The groundbreaking 1989 arcade game is still one of the very best arcade action games ever, and every bit as pioneering to the industry as Street Fighter II just two years later. Turtle power indeed!

Scott Mendelson

Credit where credit is due: Ashley Tisdale does have a new gig after all.


Three weeks ago, when discussing the film career of Zac Efron, I made references to how the rest of the High School Musical cast wasn't doing nearly as well as he was after the principals left the franchise. I specifically mentioned Ashley Tisdale, and basically implied that she was having trouble finding work outside of the franchise because she was returning to the fourth film and playing Sharpay in a spin-off film. Well, in all fairness, she has a co-starring role in a new television series premiering just next month. It's called Hellcats, it airs on the CW, and it's about cheerleaders. Anything other than that I'll leave to you (although it's nice that Sharon Leal of Boston Public, Dreamgirls, and Why Did I Get Married? will get a steady paycheck), I just thought I owed Ms. Tisdale a mea culpa.

Scott Mendelson

As the search narrows down to just five actresses, just how 'token' will Spider-Man's girlfriend be in the new reboot?

Melissa Silverstein over at Women and Hollywood took understandable umbrage at the flurry of articles discussing just which young actress would be playing Peter Parker's girlfriend (who apparently might not be Mary Jane) in the upcoming Spider-Man reboot. The finalists are apparently Emma Roberts, Teresa Palmer, Lilly Collins, and Imogen Poots, and Ophelia Lovibond. Her annoyance stems from the phrasing of these articles, which basically amounts to 'which promising young actress gets to play the quasi jail-bait piece of meat that Spidey rescues and then makes out with?' I wrote about this back in March. It’s the dilemma of most working actresses, forced to choose either no mainstream work or be stuck playing the ‘token female character/love interest’. I’m less offended in this case because we’re talking about Spider-Man here. If we knew which one of Parker’s comic book girlfriends was in the reboot, the articles simply would have read ‘who’s playing Mary Jane Watson/Gwen Stacey/Betty Brant/etc', and they would likely contain a token amount of comic book backstory. But the obstacle that actresses face, being cast only in relation to the male lead, is a fair charge and one worth repeating.

As for it being a token female role, it’s all a matter of how the movie is. Like all genres, the comic book adaptation has a mixed record in the realm of female characters. While the out-and-out female superhero lineup is embarrassingly slim, being the female lead in a comic book film doesn't automatically doom you to tokenism. Compare the two Hulk movies. Liv Tyler’s Betty Ross was regulated to being ‘the girl’ in The Incredible Hulk, but Jennifer Connely’s Betty Ross was a fully-fleshed out lead character with a life and issues all her own in Hulk. The Ang Lee drama spent a large amount of time with Betty Ross in moments where Bruce Banner isn’t around, which is the test of a full-blown female character. Alas, an even more valid contrast exists with the two Rachel Dawes character in Nolan’s Batman pictures. In Batman Begins, Katie Holmes is not the love interest so much as Bruce’s conscience and moral compass, a character with a strong point of view who moves the story along as a result of her compassionate morality (she was the Leslie Thompkins of that particular universe). Alas, in The Dark Knight, Maggie Gyllenhaal was basically the prize to be won between Wayne and Dent, and then relegated to a woman in a refrigerator. There are other bright spots. Pepper Potts’s generally platonic relationship with Stark in Iron Man 2 was the best thing about that misfire, as she was an equal and confident, someone who Stark trusted to call him out on his bullshit and keep him honest. She wasn’t ‘the girl’, but a fully-fleshed out supporting character.

As for the Raimi Spider-Man films, they are at heart romantic dramas. The primary story IS the courtship between Parker and Mary Jane. Her issues and problems and character arc is about as important as Peter’s (less so in the overrated second film, where she IS mainly a prize). There may have been web-slinging action and super hero fights, but the overreaching arc was a slow-building love story between nerdy outcast Peter Parker and abused child/would-be actress Mary Jane. To Raimi's credit, there was never any attempt to make Mary Jane a 'tough chick who can hold her own in the thick of battle', but instead gave Kirsten Dunst a three-dimensional character to play. Her role was especially beefed up in the somewhat unfairly maligned Spider-Man 3 (in fact, some of the criticism from male critics came from the large amount of screen-time devoted to Mary Jane's personal issues).

If this new Spider-Man reboot really does end up as an adaptation of Ultimate Spider-Man, then Mary Jane/Gwen Stacy will be every bit the ‘lead character in her own life’ that Peter Parker is. The Bendis books, at least in their initial years, focused even less on big-scale action than the movies, to the point where it was genuinely shocking when someone was murdered. If this new film is firmly planted as a character-driven teen romance with as much webslinging as $80 million can buy you, then there is no reason to assume that whomever gets the co-starring gig with Andrew Garfield will end up with little to do but bat her eyes and scream for her life. We’ll see…

Scott Mendelson

'Rumors from the crazy guy on the corner': David Slade to helm X-Men Origins: Wolverine 2? But what of the video game spin-off?

Vulture has reported that the top contender to direct the sequel to X-Men Origins: Wolverine (which itself was a prequel to X-Men) is none other than David Slade. Following his success on Twilight Saga: Eclipse, which likely surpassed the domestic gross of New Moon just today, Slade is being courted by Hugh Jackman himself to do the 'Wolverine goes to Japan' story-arc promised in the post-credit cookie of the last film. While the first Wolverine spin-off was pretty much detested by critics and audiences alike, the $150 million film still opened with $85 million and pulled in $373 million worldwide despite being bootlegged online by Fox Studios -I mean by scary foreigners- a full month prior to the film's theatrical release. Since original director Gavin Hood (Tsotsi, Rendition) apparently had all kinds of behind the scenes turmoil with Fox studios, it's no surprise that he won't be back. This would be David Slade's fourth film, following the critically-acclaimed Hard Candy, the vampire comic book adaptation 30 Days of Night (both solid genre pictures), and the aforementioned Eclipse (slightly overrated, I still prefer Hardwicke's quirky humor). Why, do you ask, am I reporting on this generally unwanted sequel to an original film that I detested? Well, because while X-Men Origins: Wolverine the movie was pretty god-awful, X-Men Origins: Wolverine the video game was one of the most flat-out entertaining and enjoyable action games I've played in years. Yes, I'm excited about a big-budget tentpole picture because I'm looking forward to the video game spin off.

Scott Mendelson